Top

First @ TSSZ: Did IGN’s Unleashed Reviewer Play the Whole Game?

Tristan Oliver | December 4, 2008

Alleged Profile Shows…Not Even Close

Hilary Goldstein–male, not female–is not a popular figure in the Sonic community right now.  His 4.5 out of 10 score for the XBOX360 edition of Sonic Unleashed on IGN, one of the top gaming sites in the world, has caused quite a stir.

Now, evidence has surfaced that claims Mr. Goldstein may not have completed the base game for his review.  In fact…he may not have even completed half the game.

TSSZ News has obtained images that are circulating on the Sega and GameFAQs message boards.  The image is alleged to be the XBOX profile of Mr. Goldstein–with the nickname “killhil.”

The statistics he has for Sonic Unleashed, if true, are quite eyeopening–only a 190 gamerscore with only 12 out of 50 achievements unlocked, only 24% of the game’s goals reached.

It gets better.  The image shows his latest major achievement as it pertains to the game’s progress was “Picking up the Pieces”–completing the fourth continent.  The image shows Goldstein’s latest achievement being the level-up on his Lightspeed Dash on Monday.  Another image suggests, as of Monday, he has not restored the fifth or sixth continent, and has not compelted the game.

Right now there is no information to suggest this is false, though we are still working to verify the authenticity of the imagery.  In light of this coming out, there have been several calls for Mr. Goldstein to be fired, or at least review the game once more upon its completion.  A petition has even been established for the latter effort, though with very little signatures to show for it at the moment.

We want to know your thoughts on this drastic turn of events in the row involving Unleashed’s poor showing in the mainstreaming gaming media.  Let us know in the comments section below.

Comments

52 Responses to “First @ TSSZ: Did IGN’s Unleashed Reviewer Play the Whole Game?”

  1. Crazee on December 4th, 2008 6.23 pm

    This is common in reviews…it’s not just for SU. It just shows that people should listen to the opinions of their friends and community figures before scores by random journalists. And that has been solid, so I go with them here.

    This isn’t just a Sonic thing, guys. This happens with other games, too. I saw it happen with another game recently…

    Oh, and NP lied about having to replay stages in the Wii version of Unleashed multiple times. You don’t. The missions are small levels with alterations in level design(except for Time Attack levels…though some of those are different, too). Check out some secret missions on youtube. You even get a Chun-Nan mission where you run on the dragon…unlike the actual level. If they made these missions actual levels…the game would have had a better balance. It’s a shame. But yeah…you actually have replays more in the 360 version since medals are required and bad players may have to repeat stages to get them all. The Wii version only uses medals to unlock Gaia gate doors…not additional levels(at least, not required levels).

  2. InstantSonic on December 4th, 2008 6.25 pm

    HANG HIM, BURN HIM AT THE STAKE

  3. overbound on December 4th, 2008 6.29 pm

    That’s fairly normal when you reviewing as many games as they have to. At any rate most of the reviews were mediocre to negative so its not like his review was that much different from any of the others out there.

  4. Acell on December 4th, 2008 6.41 pm

    Man when I saw him play that on the video he kept messsing up so yeah the 360 version needs a better score like a 7 or a 8

  5. Soap Scum (aka GENERALZERO, BlackHawkOmega) on December 4th, 2008 6.41 pm

    Ha! Hahahaha!

  6. Kaylun on December 4th, 2008 6.46 pm

    I do notice this:
    He showed his own footage of the game and it looked awsome and he called it all sorts of things. He didn’t even give a good example of trial and error. The idiot jumped over a speed ramp!
    I’m no ranter but that was pathetic. People typically dislike things that they are no good at and this girl/man/thingamabob is in this scenario.

  7. Acell on December 4th, 2008 6.48 pm

    The guy with a girls name sucks at this game hes like oh I know how to play it but lets mess up and do stuff that will make the fans get mad YOU SUCK IGN

  8. SLJCOAAATR / Soul the Hedgehog (You can call me either SLJ, or Soul) on December 4th, 2008 7.00 pm

    I think he has right to not finish a game he hates. You can make an accurate review. -_-

  9. Lamb84 on December 4th, 2008 7.29 pm

    So because he hates the game, he tries to make a majority of people hate the game?!

  10. thesnake383 on December 4th, 2008 7.48 pm

    Break out the torches and pitchforks!

  11. JJ on December 4th, 2008 7.52 pm

    Oh brother, is it really mandatory to complete a game in order to review it? Most professional journalists don’t do this anyway so this isn’t a new thing. I say despite of what you think of his review, I think it’s fair to say he got far enough even though he didn’t enjoy himself that it would have been a decent accessment of the game to write it.

    And that petition is as lame as that ban 4KIDS one that dealt with the VAs. People in this fandom can be really pathetic.

  12. Hypo Prower on December 4th, 2008 8.28 pm

    @SLJ: he has the right, alright, but it doesn’t make for a very good review when you have to complete most the game to enjoy it.

  13. Tristan Oliver on December 4th, 2008 9.11 pm

    I think the point of contention here is that he may not have even completed *half* the base game.

    -T

  14. Jojo Varnson on December 4th, 2008 9.17 pm

    Just so you know, the rate at which you finish the continents is not consistent. I could manage two in an hour then later it takes 4 more hours to get enough medals to finish the last two continents. And it’s not like the gameplay magically changes, if anything the final stage would be too tough for this guy. He might have given it a 3.5 if he finished it…

  15. SatBK on December 4th, 2008 9.28 pm

    That’s it. I’m gonna kill him.

  16. Ryan Bloom on December 4th, 2008 10.10 pm

    The amount of the game he completed could most likely be finished in a single sitting. It’s not much of a stretch to imagine this guy played the game once (twice, if you want to be generous), and then wrote his review based off of that.

    There’s also the question of the video used in the video review of the game, which shows footage from the first hour or so, by somebody doing a comedically horrible job at playing the game.

    I dunno about a petition, but it’s fairly clear that this guy didn’t really try to give this game a chance. The video captured on the game reflects poorly on it as well, perhaps on purpose.

    My question is: Given the legacy of the franchise, should he have given it a chance? It’s sort of his job to, yes, but given that this is the christmas rush and all…

  17. SLJCOAAATR / Soul the Hedgehog (You can call me either SLJ, or Soul) on December 4th, 2008 10.13 pm

    JJ’s got it right. Actually, no Hypo. I’ve played games that only got worse the farther in you got. He played enough to make a good judgement. It’s HIS opinion. People need to stop going crazy over a few reviewers who don’t like the series that much anymore. We’re all entitled to our own opinion, y’konw? Nobody’s opinion is fact, and no one should take offense from another persons. There’s too many whiny, bitchy, annoying, emotional fanboys/girls in our fanbase. I feel like I’m surrounded by idiotic jerk-offs. I’ve met very few sane fans, and that’s saying alot, since I’ve met a very large portion of the fanbase…

  18. NintendoBrad on December 4th, 2008 10.14 pm

    “Right now there is no information to suggest this is false”

    There’s no information to suggest it’s true, either.

    Anyone can pull a Photoshopped Gamercard out of their bottom. Considering the current angry mob status Sonic fans hold at the moment, it wouldn’t surprise me if that’s the case.

  19. Tristan Oliver on December 4th, 2008 10.27 pm

    NintendoBrad: That’s where my favorite word “alleged” comes in. =)

    The thing that leads me to think this was not faked was that it appears the imagery did not originate from a Sonic community area proper. But again, if it’s false, the story will be corrected.

    -T

  20. NintendoBrad on December 4th, 2008 10.33 pm

    From D’harhan at the Sonic Stadium Message Boards:

    “I don’t mean to stir shit here, but I showed the picture of the HillKill Unleashed achievement thing to a few people earlier, while I mulled it over, and I’ve heard back from the tech savvy member of that bunch (the only person bothered, really)…”

    “You might never want to trust that picture’s source again.

    The gamertag you link to is private so none of it’s details are public. That screenshot didn’t come from the gamertag you mentioned. It was taking from another one (and carefully cropped to remove all the locked achievements above it, for all the other worlds) or photoshop’d entirely.

    Or does the source have a special way of seeing private gamertag details?”

    He doesn’t provide a direct source, but he’s not the the type who lies about things like this. Make of it what you will.

  21. Tristan Oliver on December 4th, 2008 10.48 pm

    NintendoBrad: Two flaws in your source evidence.

    First, I found D’harhan’s original entry, and it stated:

    “The gamertag [HillKill - D] you link to is private so none of it’s details are public. That screenshot didn’t come from the gamertag you mentioned. It was taking from another one (and carefully cropped to remove all the locked achievements above it, for all the other worlds) or photoshop’d entirely.”

    The shot above states the tag to be “killhil.” That’s quite different.

    Second, even if it’s a goof on D’harhan’s part, we can date these images to be at least 24 hours old, and these have circulated on a lot of message boards before I decided to pick up the story. I’m not 100% on how gamertags work, but I have to think it’s not entirely out of the question for Mr. Goldstein to have privatized his profile since, as a means of denial or damage control.

    That, plus no source cited, pared with the comments Blaze provided above…I think the story’s gotta stay as is for now.

    -T

  22. Mr. X on December 4th, 2008 11.01 pm
  23. NintendoBrad on December 4th, 2008 11.22 pm

    Fair enough. If this really is Hilary’s Gamertag, I stand corrected.

  24. DoctorEggman on December 5th, 2008 1.39 am

    This is the kind of crap we’ve come to expect from “professional” reviewers these days. And to think these guys affect the overall scores of places like GameRankings. If IGN’s staff can’t handle the job of reviewing games properly, they need to hire more people to take care of other things so we don’t get half-assed reviews. I KNOW that people like IGN fail to give quality reviews all the time, it’s not just with Sonic games like this. And I’ve wasted money because of it. This is just low of them.

  25. Aqua Team (Also Known as uToobSmeElz) on December 5th, 2008 2.47 am

    A GUY NAMED HILARY?

    Nuff Said.

  26. TikalFannie on December 5th, 2008 3.44 am

    Yo, writer, ya don`t even got through the game!!! And you writing review?!!!! WHAT A SHAME!!

  27. Antonio Felix on December 5th, 2008 7.02 am

    I think if you’re not interested to review a game, just give it for other one. Official reviews are jornalism! Is his job, not a forum message board where you can write anything that pops out your head…

    Also, LOL @ the Aqua Team comment:

    “A GUY NAMED HILARY?

    Nuff Said.”

    ROFL, well remembered.

  28. Danielle on December 5th, 2008 8.45 am

    I dont really give a flying crap. I love the way us fans love to single IGN out as the most bias review site and say “I dont listen to IGN they are bias” then next mintue petitions are flying out.

    So he didnt do the later half of the game… thank god he didnt because if he reached the last level he might of score this game 2 points less. From what I have heard sonic team didnt even send review copies out and you know what that means when companies dont do that.

  29. Jerbba on December 5th, 2008 10.23 am

    This is ridiculous. If IGN had given SU better score nobody would care how much time they spent with it…

  30. Oznic on December 5th, 2008 11.14 am

    In my opinion you have to finish the whole game and then make review. I don’t really care that much, but I think people that plays a game in 30 minutes or less can not make a review. Ok if it takes 20 minutes to finish a game you can do that.But you know what I mean.

  31. Sonication on December 5th, 2008 12.49 pm

    Ugh, you are all acting ridiculous.

    But fake or not about completing the game, I have a feeling that IGN will not refuse to change the score and make a better review.

  32. Acell on December 5th, 2008 1.27 pm

    Ign you piece of garbage I hope your site gets destroyed

  33. Hypo Prower on December 5th, 2008 4.48 pm

    Seriously, do we even know if this is true? For now I’m going to sit back and see if this story happens to develop.

  34. Potato on December 5th, 2008 5.53 pm

    If he finished it he would have played more awesome daytime stages, and how can the Werehog bring the score so low if the daytime stages are ‘perfect’?

  35. Mr. X on December 5th, 2008 5.58 pm
  36. SLJCOAAATR / Soul the Hedgehog (You can call me either SLJ, or Soul) on December 5th, 2008 8.21 pm

    Fanboys/girls are hilarious these days. *Throws popcorn in microwave* And to think, I was gonna switch my loyalty to Lost, rofl.

  37. anonymous on December 6th, 2008 1.29 pm

    What kind of parent name thier male child “Hilary”

  38. SLJCOAAATR / Soul the Hedgehog (You can call me either SLJ, or Soul) on December 6th, 2008 11.36 pm

    Does that really matter?

  39. @Issue Poll: 91% Don’t Trust MSM Unleashed Reviews | tssz|news on December 8th, 2008 7.45 am

    [...] notable that this poll was still conducted when evidenced surfaced of IGN’s Hilary Goldstein potentially not completing even half of the base [...]

  40. Who Reviews the Reviewers? | 2P START! on December 10th, 2008 3.17 pm

    [...] 360 version. While this baffled me, I wasn’t too upset until I found out that the reviewer DIDN’T FINISH THE GAME! That’s right, Hilary Goldstein’s gamertag spills the beans, just 4 of the 7 continents [...]

  41. number 17 » Who ya gonna call? It’s Game Watch! on December 12th, 2008 2.09 am

    [...] 360 and gave it 45/100, one of the lower scores according to Metacritic. But then someone found the reviewer’s Live Gamertag, and checked his achievements. It appears that the reviewer didn’t finish the game, and had [...]

  42. chainsawleon on December 12th, 2008 6.29 am

    Simple answer: he played the game for review on a debug unit. Then, he played some of it on a retail unit to make sure there weren’t any problems with it. They do it all the time.

  43. Solaris Paradox on December 21st, 2008 12.24 am

    I knew this just by watching his videoreview. All of his footage is set in the first half of the game, and the level of skill he displays is even more telling: he obviously hasn’t gotten much practice, or else he’s sucking on purpose.

    That his review doesn’t feature any information relating to anything in the game’s second half, well, that’s the clincher.

  44. Marcel on December 21st, 2008 6.16 am

    Does he deserve to be fired? Maybe… If I’m reading a review by a paid employee… they should have at least finished it. Have you ever watched a movie review where the reviewer did not finish the movie? I haven’t. If you’re employed and getting a pay check please do your job.

  45. atomos on December 26th, 2008 1.00 pm

    I don’t blame him for stopping before he beat the game. The werehog segments were garbage. Sega should stop adding gimmicks and stick with the original formula they had with the genesis versions. In fact, I think that it would be better if they just made a hedgehog engine version of the genesis games…

  46. johnpaul12 on January 6th, 2009 3.54 pm

    You do know that the games they play are not full games but are some sort of debug code. This will not count your achievements. I’m sorry, but as far as your allegations go there is no proof that he hasn’t beat the game.

  47. IGN Thinks Yu Suzuki Left SEGA…to Form Prope | tssz|news on January 16th, 2009 6.14 am

    [...] their reviewer couldn’t be bothered to play through half of Sonic Unleashed.  Then, the gaming megasite had to apologize for treating [...]

  48. k0na on January 18th, 2009 8.28 pm

    It’s one thing for a gamer, who plunks down their presumably hard-earned coin, to partially play through a game and decide that their experience thus far does not merit further play. No one, save for friends with similar tastes, is holding us to a high standard; we’re allowed to say things like, “Y’know, I only played part of the game and didn’t dig what I experienced.” On the other hand, it should be the friggin’ *job* of a so-called professional reviewer to actually play the core game to completion to let us know whether or not there is *anything* salvageable in the final product, to let us know if the development team has hit on something worth our time. If they didn’t enjoy their experience, that’s fine; they’re certainly allowed to say so in their review, They still need to objectively report on the core experience, from beginning to completion, and if they don’t complete it, they need to say so from the beginning.

  49. IGN: 3.9/10 for SBK | tssz|news on March 4th, 2009 6.57 am

    [...] Sonic the Hedgehog, a game almost universally panned by critics.  You may remember that TSSZ News uncovered evidence that lead many to believe one of the IGN Unleashed reviewers, Hilary Goldstein, stopped playing the [...]

  50. IGN May Not Have Played SBK Through | tssz|news on March 6th, 2009 8.57 am

    [...] the mainstream gaming media site has given Sonic or Sega the short stick.  In December, TSSZ News showed you evidence that IGN’s Hilary Goldstein may not have finished half of the next-generation Sonic [...]

  51. Glem3 on May 28th, 2009 2.04 am

    He still hasn’t gotten any further… even if you hate a game, at least have the decency to play it half through.

  52. IGN Alters Review Policy, Future Scores | tssz|news on August 4th, 2010 12.57 pm

    [...] Editor in Chief Hilary Goldstein, who could stand to change his own personal review methods, announced changes to the whole of the media megasite’s [...]

Join the discussion!

Sound off on the story you just read. Please note: Inflammatory, unintelligible, trolling, or otherwise offensive comments are subject to editing or deletion. Excessive violation of this provision risks a permanent, irreversible IP ban from commenting. The opinions expressed in the discussion area are solely the author's, and not necessarily those of TSSZ News, its advertisers, or affiliates as a whole. Comment authors are solely responsible for the content they write.





Bottom