Comments on: IGN May Not Have Played SBK Through

By: LC master

LC master — Tue, 05 May 2009 17:06:56 +0000

but if some persons think that is a bad game (I don’t) think first: is this really bad like Sonic Unleashed for Wii and PS2 versions? (i wished more of them)

By: LC master

LC master — Tue, 05 May 2009 17:02:25 +0000

P.P.D.D: see if you can beat the game with 100% in record time! XDXDXD

By: LC master

LC master — Tue, 05 May 2009 17:01:03 +0000

P.D: the other comment clear your question Werehog?

By: LC master

LC master — Tue, 05 May 2009 16:58:29 +0000

The multiplayer really sucks with only 2 persons playing, but with 4…… jejeje……..The fun begins.
o i was forggeting something
to “beat” the game with only the true ending is about from 5 to 10 hours. But to REALLY BEAT IT (100%) you need from 2 to 5 months!

By: Cdern

Cdern — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:24:36 +0000

i really like IGN but when they review a game i start to hate them
they really are bad doing reviews PRETTY DAMN BAD!

By: Weekly News Roundup 1st-7th March - Emerald Coast

Weekly News Roundup 1st-7th March - Emerald Coast — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:03:44 +0000

[...] again, IGN manages to piss off Sonic fans, the usual allegations of not playing the game to completion in sue, followed by IGN throwing petrol on the problem. This type of thing happens every time a new [...]

By: MixMaster

MixMaster — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 21:38:54 +0000

@SonicLegends

“i have the game and its true they gave a false ending o.0 so i went back to adventure mode then i am not giving spoilers but heres something thats a hint Merlina is well i cant say it and i hated the fact that she doublecrosses you thats all i am saying ok i really shouldnt give spoilers that was just a hint and also the GAMEPLAY IS AWESOME SIMPLY AWESOME =D”

….WTF was THAT??? You deliberately said you WEREN’T going to give away any spoilers…and then you give one away. A HUGE one. Thanks for totally screwing the story over for me.

By: lazyass

lazyass — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:28:23 +0000

Quote@someone : “Oh, and as for him not finishing these games… how far can you expect someone to go if he doesn’t like it in the first place? And if it never gets any better, it’ll only give a sour attitude for the rest of the experience.”

How about finishing the damn thing, last time i checked that was his job, and hes being payed (indirectly by the readers of ign, and directly by suscribers) for it.

By: Dannyboy

Dannyboy — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:16:37 +0000

Ugh…. I hate coming here and seeing a general lack of a mature view on things.

Well, I have learned to stop relying on most professional reviewers since I never get a great idea of how the game’s going to play anyways, and too much of the review is cluttered with complaints, bitching and “Oh, if only it was still…” and blah blah blah.

About this review, I don’t blame them. The game isn’t like Unleashed where it actually deserved a good rating and got disrespectfully smashed… This was an idea that most of us were iffy about in the first place. And look, the game play turned out to be less than what we know could have been done.

In short, don’t trust “professional” reviewers, trust yourself. Play it, and if you like it, what more must be said? As for the flaming, just let it go. At the very least a large amount of fans I know said the game only truly deserved a five out of ten if we’re going to be using a crappy numbering scale anyways.

Oh, and as for him not finishing these games… how far can you expect someone to go if he doesn’t like it in the first place? And if it never gets any better, it’ll only give a sour attitude for the rest of the experience.

By: Crysore

Crysore — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:50:01 +0000

There not even trying to review a sonic game anymore, they just pick, it up say some bullshit about how the control is messed up (beacuse they cant play a sonic game for shit) call it a bad game and expect everyone to believe their IGNorant claims.