<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rotor Planned as Gay Character, Says Ken Penders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/</link>
	<description>Beyond Blue</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:47:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiver me timbers</title>
		<link>http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/comment-page-2/#comment-91825</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiver me timbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tssznews.com/?p=9141#comment-91825</guid>
		<description>Why does it matter if he&#039;s gay or not, like why does everyone care? He doesn&#039;t need to be a walking stereotype in order to be gay, nothing about him would be different. I wonder if most of you have ever even met a gay person in your lives. Gay people DO EXIST in real life, and there&#039;s nothing wrong with writing them into a comic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does it matter if he&#8217;s gay or not, like why does everyone care? He doesn&#8217;t need to be a walking stereotype in order to be gay, nothing about him would be different. I wonder if most of you have ever even met a gay person in your lives. Gay people DO EXIST in real life, and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with writing them into a comic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beau</title>
		<link>http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/comment-page-2/#comment-45701</link>
		<dc:creator>Beau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 07:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tssznews.com/?p=9141#comment-45701</guid>
		<description>I think overall, it doesn&#039;t really add, or take anything away from the character. Still as Violet said it seems like a cheap ploy to just have a &quot;token ambuguously gay character&quot; in the series, and nothing more. Or perhaps Ken thinks it might make him more &quot;unique.&quot;
I suppose it does seem cliche&#039; to &quot;out&quot;  one character just because he&#039;s &quot;soft-spoken,&quot; and never had a girlfriend, or any form of romance, or anything in the series before. Rotor never really struck me that way personally.
I think considering Ken doesn&#039;t work on the comic, anymore, and apparently the current comic staff wasn&#039;t aware of this, I think it&#039;s really up to the readers&#039; decision if they want Rotor to be gay, so be it. If not, that&#039;s ok, to.

I have nothing against the concept but still... His... &quot;life partner&quot; in &quot;Mobius 25 Years Later&quot;... I&#039;m sorry, but that is one uuuugly echidna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think overall, it doesn&#8217;t really add, or take anything away from the character. Still as Violet said it seems like a cheap ploy to just have a &#8220;token ambuguously gay character&#8221; in the series, and nothing more. Or perhaps Ken thinks it might make him more &#8220;unique.&#8221;<br />
I suppose it does seem cliche&#8217; to &#8220;out&#8221;  one character just because he&#8217;s &#8220;soft-spoken,&#8221; and never had a girlfriend, or any form of romance, or anything in the series before. Rotor never really struck me that way personally.<br />
I think considering Ken doesn&#8217;t work on the comic, anymore, and apparently the current comic staff wasn&#8217;t aware of this, I think it&#8217;s really up to the readers&#8217; decision if they want Rotor to be gay, so be it. If not, that&#8217;s ok, to.</p>
<p>I have nothing against the concept but still&#8230; His&#8230; &#8220;life partner&#8221; in &#8220;Mobius 25 Years Later&#8221;&#8230; I&#8217;m sorry, but that is one uuuugly echidna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Violet Whirlwind</title>
		<link>http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/comment-page-2/#comment-38578</link>
		<dc:creator>Violet Whirlwind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tssznews.com/?p=9141#comment-38578</guid>
		<description>Huh. This is news to me. Not sure what I think of it, honestly.  I have nothing against homosexuals, but I fear that if they went through with this, they&#039;d somehow botch the portrayal...sensationalizing it.  I also worry that it would just be a ploy to create a &quot;token&quot; gay character...without significant reasoning behind it. And that just seems cheap, and unfair to Rotor himself and unfair to homosexuals.  If they were to have a legitimate reason for it, that might be different.  But this sounds like they just want to make one of the characters gay just to satisfy a diversity need, without a reason.

But it really depends on how they portrayed it. Perhaps it would be better to introduce completely different characters for this role?  I see Rotor as someone who never really was interested in a partner at all, to be honest. *shrug*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. This is news to me. Not sure what I think of it, honestly.  I have nothing against homosexuals, but I fear that if they went through with this, they&#8217;d somehow botch the portrayal&#8230;sensationalizing it.  I also worry that it would just be a ploy to create a &#8220;token&#8221; gay character&#8230;without significant reasoning behind it. And that just seems cheap, and unfair to Rotor himself and unfair to homosexuals.  If they were to have a legitimate reason for it, that might be different.  But this sounds like they just want to make one of the characters gay just to satisfy a diversity need, without a reason.</p>
<p>But it really depends on how they portrayed it. Perhaps it would be better to introduce completely different characters for this role?  I see Rotor as someone who never really was interested in a partner at all, to be honest. *shrug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jase</title>
		<link>http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/comment-page-2/#comment-31608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tssznews.com/?p=9141#comment-31608</guid>
		<description>Pretty silly stuff.

But...reading some of these comments and going by some stuff I see on the net on a daily basis...I can&#039;t help but wonder something. If some people here are all for gay rights and so on as they claim...why are the homosexual treated like something we have to shield our children from? Or something that&#039;s &quot;too much to be bothered with&quot;

Maybe it is a bit much for an adventure comic but still...Just some food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty silly stuff.</p>
<p>But&#8230;reading some of these comments and going by some stuff I see on the net on a daily basis&#8230;I can&#8217;t help but wonder something. If some people here are all for gay rights and so on as they claim&#8230;why are the homosexual treated like something we have to shield our children from? Or something that&#8217;s &#8220;too much to be bothered with&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe it is a bit much for an adventure comic but still&#8230;Just some food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mysti</title>
		<link>http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/comment-page-2/#comment-26645</link>
		<dc:creator>Mysti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tssznews.com/?p=9141#comment-26645</guid>
		<description>To be honest this is pretty irellivent, no one should be makking a fuss, anything of interest, please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest this is pretty irellivent, no one should be makking a fuss, anything of interest, please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metal Shadow X</title>
		<link>http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/comment-page-2/#comment-24715</link>
		<dc:creator>Metal Shadow X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tssznews.com/?p=9141#comment-24715</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t care who that is (I don&#039;t hate the comic or cartoons, I just personally like the Sonic games), but I still think it&#039;s pretty cool since this should knock some Sonic homophobes down a few pegs *cough*CWC*cough*.

And, correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but didn&#039;t Lexington beat this guy to the punch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t care who that is (I don&#8217;t hate the comic or cartoons, I just personally like the Sonic games), but I still think it&#8217;s pretty cool since this should knock some Sonic homophobes down a few pegs *cough*CWC*cough*.</p>
<p>And, correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but didn&#8217;t Lexington beat this guy to the punch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/comment-page-2/#comment-24600</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tssznews.com/?p=9141#comment-24600</guid>
		<description>If anything, I would have thought they would have chosen Antoine. &gt;&gt; 

I would have liked to know how they would have handled that. They probably didn&#039;t need an entire story arc for it, though. Stronger hints would have been just fine, if they really wanted to show it. Sexuality doesn&#039;t matter!

The original storyline wasn&#039;t meant to focus so much on the relationships between characters (or lack thereof), anyway. Honestly, at this point, I think they&#039;re creating drama because they don&#039;t have any better ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anything, I would have thought they would have chosen Antoine. >> </p>
<p>I would have liked to know how they would have handled that. They probably didn&#8217;t need an entire story arc for it, though. Stronger hints would have been just fine, if they really wanted to show it. Sexuality doesn&#8217;t matter!</p>
<p>The original storyline wasn&#8217;t meant to focus so much on the relationships between characters (or lack thereof), anyway. Honestly, at this point, I think they&#8217;re creating drama because they don&#8217;t have any better ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/comment-page-2/#comment-24139</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tssznews.com/?p=9141#comment-24139</guid>
		<description>Nothing against homosexuality or anything of that matter. But I&#039;m glad they never went through with this idea if for one reason. It was just an idea thrown in there for shock value. The comic story has become so much like a day time soap opera already why add more to it? 

Seriously...what happened to this comic series? The story lines at the begining were so simple. Sonic and the Freedom Fighters fighting against Dr. Robotnik to free Mobius. Maybe throw in a couple silly situations and corney dialog here and there....but it was still just good ol&#039; plain simple fun to read. I stopped reading the series around the time the Knuckles the Echidna series ended at issue 30-ish ( I tihnk the last issue was 33 I can&#039;t remember its been so long) Even then, yes there was a little drama and a couple new twists and turns but it was still pretty basic and easy to follow. 

I&#039;ve been trying to get back into the series, but reading the new comics now its like its completely different concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing against homosexuality or anything of that matter. But I&#8217;m glad they never went through with this idea if for one reason. It was just an idea thrown in there for shock value. The comic story has become so much like a day time soap opera already why add more to it? </p>
<p>Seriously&#8230;what happened to this comic series? The story lines at the begining were so simple. Sonic and the Freedom Fighters fighting against Dr. Robotnik to free Mobius. Maybe throw in a couple silly situations and corney dialog here and there&#8230;.but it was still just good ol&#8217; plain simple fun to read. I stopped reading the series around the time the Knuckles the Echidna series ended at issue 30-ish ( I tihnk the last issue was 33 I can&#8217;t remember its been so long) Even then, yes there was a little drama and a couple new twists and turns but it was still pretty basic and easy to follow. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to get back into the series, but reading the new comics now its like its completely different concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flynn on Rotor&#8217;s Sexuality: &#8220;Not Even Worth Mentioning&#8221; &#124; tssz&#124;news</title>
		<link>http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/comment-page-2/#comment-23424</link>
		<dc:creator>Flynn on Rotor&#8217;s Sexuality: &#8220;Not Even Worth Mentioning&#8221; &#124; tssz&#124;news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tssznews.com/?p=9141#comment-23424</guid>
		<description>[...] even went so far as to outright deny that any hints were dropped, as Penders suggested: Not even worth mentioning. There was absolutely no canonnical build-up to Rotor&#8217;s sexual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even went so far as to outright deny that any hints were dropped, as Penders suggested: Not even worth mentioning. There was absolutely no canonnical build-up to Rotor&#8217;s sexual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corneliab</title>
		<link>http://www.tssznews.com/2009/11/10/rotor-planned-as-gay-character-says-ken-penders/comment-page-2/#comment-23228</link>
		<dc:creator>corneliab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tssznews.com/?p=9141#comment-23228</guid>
		<description>This would have been such a pointlessly horrid idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would have been such a pointlessly horrid idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

