Why did Kevin Eva Reward the Key Harbor of the Sonic 4 Leaks?
In recent months, you may have noticed the presence of “joint exclusives” on other sites provided in cooperation with Sonic Wrecks and its webmaster, Kevin Eva, an employee of Sega Europe. They have been few and far between, and ranged from an announcement of an announcement that ultimately yielded Sonic 4′s delay to the most recent reveal of an in-game cutscene from Sonic Colors. In on the alliance is Sonic Retro, which in March and April came under intense scrutiny for allowing the slow release of in-game video for Sonic the Hedgehog 4: Episode I’s Microsoft PartnerNET build by a forum member, eventually revealing the entire game’s contents. Only after the damage was done was any serious administrative action taken, including the outright ban of any Sonic 4 discussion on the website for a short time.
That is where this story starts. It turns out prominent names in the Sonic Retro hierarchy were offered their first exclusive shortly after that incident, one you weren’t supposed to know about.
While legal threats and takedown notices were levied upon most anything relaying that and other leaked Sonic 4 videos, from YouTube accounts to 1UP.com (and this site, for the record), TSSZ News has found at least two top Sonic Retro admins were offered and, in one case, given personal gifts by Eva after his request to purge leaked material on the was mostly, though not completely heeded. Such philanthropy was offered even as Eva was one of many on Sega’s community teams using the threat of legal action to have that material removed elsewhere–and evenas some of those leaks were available on Sonic Retro up until Episode I’s launch. You may remember that Sega of America community manager Aaron Webber even warned to another member of Sonic Retro in February, six weeks before leaks ramped up on the same website, that any compromise “would have huge consequences for us (Sega), and I know it wouldn’t end on a good note for anyone.”

But the only known consequence for Sonic Retro, it appears, was the receipt of a signed print of Sonic and the Secret Rings, autographed by director Yojiro Ogawa. Its receipt was first disclosed publicly on Twitter May 10th by Sonic Retro forum administrator Dustin Wyatt, known casually as Tweaker. Wyatt revealed he received a package from Sega’s European division, sight unseen.
“Just received an envelope from SEGA of Europe!” the Tweet read. “It had a signed print from Secret Rings signed by the game’s director, Yojiro Ogawa. Neat!”
From there, a public Twitter conversation ensued between Wyatt and Eva, and the print was revealed to be a gift sent by Eva.

“That’s your present from me I promised,” said one Tweet from Eva’s @SonicWrecks account also dated May 10th.
“Like I said my little personal stash. Well deserved as well,” proclaimed another Eva Tweet. Thanks for all your help.”
That “help” was the removal of those leaked playthrough videos, not directly hosted but hyperlinked from Sonic Retro forums, which caused almost unprecentended fan reaction. The videos were made available in increments during the week of March 28th by Sonic Retro forumer infinity, who has since been banned from the research hub. Still, the video spread, with both Sega’s community team and the company’s legal department sending takedown notices to alleged copyright offenders throughout the week to most who linked or hosted the material.
“We were helping SEGA take down all the Sonic 4 stuff as a whole and Kevin seemed to be impressed at our dedication in particular,” Wyatt said when reached for comment by TSSZ News on the matter in August.
But it wasn’t until the final zone, E.G.G. Station, and the game’s ending teasing Metal Sonic for the next episode was shown on April 3rd did Retro moderators make any effort to remove the video or references to it and other leaks. Once the last bit of Episode I was spoiled, administrators temporarily banned all Sonic 4 discussion, and in doing so, caused a stir that reached outside the confines of the Sonic community, with critics labeling Retro heads as hyprocrites, if not outright mocking the website. That forced the hand of webmaster Courtney Grimes, known as Scarred Sun, to admit a relationship between the website and Sega was forged in an explanatory statement April 5th.
“When we spoke to (Sega) representatives, we were looking forward to establishing a relationship that would lead to things that would ultimately help the Sonic fan community [....] we would be able to gain access to things that we cannot now get under current procedures,” the statement read.
It was after that statement was made that Eva began coordinating the gift giving. Wyatt told TSSZ News anything sent was alleged to be out of Eva’s personal collection of Sega related merchandise.
“He (Eva) took me aside after the fact, thanked me, then sent me a message on Skype asking for my address because he wanted to send me and SS ‘something nice for all the hard work,’ Wyatt explained. “What I can tell you is that none of this was a ‘bribe’ or whatever.”
To that point, personal access was the only access Sonic Retro received, until a May 17th “joint-exclusive” tease of what ultimately was first formally announced on Gamespot–the delay of Sonic 4′s release to Fall. The website had to wait until late October for anything more in the public interest, receiving access to an in-game cutscene from Sonic Colors for the trouble.
But before then, Eva asked for both Wyatt and Grimes’s mailing addresses in April to send gifts. We know both were offered, but can only confirm Wyatt actually received something. Multiple requests for comment to Grimes asking if she accepted this offer and related inquiries were not returned.

Some of that work Eva thanked them for, however, remained unfinished. Leaked material–albeit less–was discussed and even made available on Sonic Retro’s main pages up to launch day. Though videos “outside of Splash Hill Zone” were outlawed both on the forum and IRC channel once discussion resumed, a February 16th article written by Wyatt showcasing a menu with the game’s zones was still publicly available, before any formal unveiling, and still is as of the time of this article’s publication. The same is true of a March 28th article, also written by Wyatt, that linked to and discussed the full game soundtrack, though the link to the third party website no longer contains those assets. A February article titled “More Sonic 4 Screenshots Leaked, on PartnerNET” and a March article titled “New Sonic 4 Assets” were removed from Sonic Retro’s main page. All were, at one point, front page news on Sonic Retro.
In an April 3rd interview with TSSZ News, Wyatt said of those materials in whole, “Once something leaks, I don’t particularly see the point in trying to suppress.” And in her April 5th statement on Sonic Retro, Grimes referred to those leaked materials as “low impact.”
“Barring a single leak involving achievement text and a video sent anonymously to GameVideos, every single reveal about Sonic 4 has come from…Sonic Retro,” said another portion of Grimes’s April 5th statement.
To Eva’s end, the offer to Wyatt and Grimes came as he continued to threaten other sources in his capacity as a Sega employee for harboring the same material Sonic Retro did–contradicting and potentially undermining the control of such sensitive content. A May 21st remark on his Twitter account affirms his continued the push to purge unauthorized material from the Internet, and infers knowledge of the use of alternate, deceptive titles–common practice in YouTube videos–in spreading the leaks.
“Just kicked some improper video ass,” Eva said in the Tweet. “False titles indeed….”
For Mark Methenitis, an attorney with The Vernon Law Group in Dallas, Texas, and the webmaster of the Law of the Game blog, it’s behavior like Eva’s, juxtposed with Sega’s efforts to eradicate the leaked content, that calls ethics into question. TSSZ News sought his insight in May, when this story was first fermenting.
“The part that bothers me is the use of formal cease and desist letters to the other sites,” Methenitis explained. “At a minimum, if they (Sega) never intended further action, it’s a tactic that still acts to benefit one site over the others once the information is out and no real effort is being made to control it. If they actually intended selective enforcement, I think there would be a fairly big legal battle over the issue.”
In particular, Methenitis finds offers to those behind the principal source of the Sonic 4 leaks while punishing others unsettling–but not a legal cause for action.
“It’s certainly a mixed message, and may do more harm than good in the PR world in the long run,” Methenitis said. “But beyond questionable ethics, there’s not much stopping them from adopting this tactic. It’s certainly not one I would advise.”
“If this is a real leak, it’s nothing short of baffling that one site (Sonic Retro) would be systematically excluded from the cease and desist mailing,” Methenitis continued.
*****
Wyatt, however, sees the situation in another light: as one friend trying to help another.
“My initial SEGA of Europe comment was more or less innocent misunderstanding that probably wouldn’t have mattered much in the long run since nobody particularly cared to look more into something that, quite frankly, was nothing more than a friendly gesture by a friend who happens to also be a SEGA employee,” Wyatt said, citing his May 10th remark on Twitter.
Wyatt claimed to TSSZ News Sonic Retro’s partnership with Sega, cited in Grimes’s April 5th statement, extended to the American division only, and that Eva, in this context, was acting independent of the company.
“Our relationship with SEGA is with SEGA of America–completely unrelated to Eva and SEGA of Europe,” Wyatt said.
It must be noted, however, that all of Sonic Retro’s “joint-exclusives” thus far have been through Eva, and not through the American division. Still, Wyatt insists anything Eva has done for him and Grimes–and perhaps for Sonic Retro–was of his own accord.
“That’s what (the gifts) were–personal tokens of his appreciation as a person, since he is in fact an ordinary guy who just happens to be employed by SEGA,” Wyatt said. “Nothing more. I can’t stress this enough.”

There’s a significant hole in Wyatt’s argument, however, and you’re looking at it. The photo above, provided by Wyatt to TSSZ News, is the enevelope Eva allegedly used to send the signed copy of Sonic & the Secret Rings to him. Wyatt claims the envelopes are available for any employee to use for “any given purpose,” in his words. But Sega branded labels appear throughout, including what appears to be Sega branded company postage, sent out of Brentford, Middlesex, in the United Kingdom–home of the offices of Sega Europe Ltd, according to GamesIndustry.biz. However personal the gifts may have been, if they were sent directly through company resources–which, to be clear, can’t be completely confirmed on the picture alone–it’s a tremendous lapse of judgment given Sega’s objectives at the time.
“From what I’ve been made aware of these envelopes are literally just sitting around to send mail through if you’re an employee there,” Wyatt said, adding his belief the envelope is the only physical connection to Sega Europe, as opposed to any possible use of a company postage system.
“If this is not the case–and it should be, given that if company policy dictated otherwise they’d be aware of it by now–then I have no knowledge of it,” Wyatt added in a follow-up E-Mail.
We have no knowledge of it from Eva, either. E-Mails requesting comment on the matter from him were not directly returned, but vaguely referenced our request in a July 31st Tweet he made, in which he accused of TSSZ News attempting to tie of the release of this story to the 2010 Summer of Sonic convention.
*****
We do, however, know Sega conducted a short investigation of the matter when we started asking questions of them directly earlier this Summer. In a phone conversation with TSSZ News at the beginning of June, then-VP of Marketing Sean Ratcliffe told us the company found no qualms with Eva’s conduct.
“It was a thank-you gift to the website,” Ratcliffe explained, after being reminded the personal circumstances of the offer. “We really don’t have a problem with that.”
It was from Ratcliffe that we learned Sonic 4′s real reason for delay, which we told you about in September: poor focus group testing that occurred before the meat of the leaks were made available. When the leaks did happen, he explained Sonic Retro was asked to remove offending material, but was never given a cease-and-desist letter.
“A cease and desist letter wasn’t necessary,” Ratcliffe said. “That’s not helping the consumer at all.”
Ratcliffe explained Sega’s established media partners–some 300 of them–were all given a pre-emptive request not to publish the leaked content. Ratcliffe estimated “99.9%” of those partners complied. For the record, TSSZ News was not among those notified ahead of time.
The conversation took an odd twist after that, when Ratcliffe constantly voiced his opinion that there was no story to report. Ratcliffe even offered TSSZ News the opportunity to be among the press core at Sega’s next New York event for dropping the story. That never happened; neither did an assurance made by Ratcliffe to afford a conversation between this organization and Sega staff in the hopes of forging a closer relationship. We now know there’s a good, if not suspicious reason for that; as learned earlier this month, Ratcliffe left the company for reasons unknown later in June.

As good a person Eva may be, and as personal his gifts may have been, it is clear he is using his professional connections to benefit his closest Internet friends first and the fandom second, bending the rules of engagement–and perhaps basic company policy–in one of Sega’s most serious leaks in recent memory. Nowhere is that more evident than in the above publicly published photo, taken March 18th within the halls of Sega Europe, not two weeks before a couple “low impact” leaks already available on Sonic Retro–and pleas from Sega’s own staff for there not to be anymore–became a serious security breach, all within the confines of the website. Eva–the friend or the Sega employee, we’re not sure–afforded the invitation to Grimes and Sonic Stadium webmaster Svend Joscelyne; all three are pictured. That Eva the friend in effect handpicked his proteges at the time for the more professional purpose of promotion and preferential treatment may not be that surprising; admittedly, both Sonic Retro and The Sonic Stadium are formidable, influential forces within Sonic fandom. But when Grimes admitted the website she’s responsible for was the principal source of nearly every Sonic 4 leak before launch, and said leaks were cleaned up, at best, in haste, why couldn’t Eva, the professional, separate those circumstances from Eva, the personal friend? For that matter, why didn’t the whole of Sega? Why, instead, was such bipolar behavior rewarded?
These are questions all parties may have to ask themselves again as Sonic 4: Episode 2 waits in the wings, with spoilers across all community factions chomping at the chance to put Eva and Sega’s loyalty to friends and fans to the test.













So it’s official then, Tristan is the Rita Skeeter of Green Hill?
TSSZ FTW! : D
Ryan sums it up, sure – but his summary doesn’t have any more validity than the actual article, imo.
Tru and Haru get it.
‘News’ posts like this are why you didn’t get anything.
The other sites have more credibility than this hellhole. Please, please, please leave your hearsay and conjecture for your Livejournal instead of digging a bigger hole for yourself by creating yet MORE negative attention for this site and further alienate yourself from a community that would rather see you not post anymore. I’m not even sure what you even planned to achieve in writing this, either.
And yet you’ll sit and wonder why nobody has respect for you after this. Why bother?
Unfortunately, article was too long of a read.
I am jealous of that signed Sonic and the Secret Rings =(
Oh man, i’m really enjoying the show here.
Tristan, instead of writing all this hyperbole I really hope you understand that the reason you don’t get crazy SEGA exclusives is because you pissed them off and they don’t like you.
The current situation is totally the result of choices you’ve made up to this point. I’m sure if you hadn’t been all gung-ho about that leaked ASR content or didn’t write articles like this to pursue your own personal vendettas you may be included on these joint exclusives.
Just think about it.
Umad bro?
Man this website used to be about Sonic news…. not minecraft and Tristans bitchfits about other websites getting things that he didn’t. Sorry Tristan but you just lost a user. I cannot take it anymore. I’ll just start using the other 3 sites that you hate much more often.
TOO LONG, DIDN’T READ. DON’T CARE.
@Tru
Causing drama, or focusing a spotlight on drama? Argue that they’re one in the same, but believe it or not, there ARE some community stories that are worth talking about. When a site “second only to Sega” bans all discussion on a hotly talked about upcoming game, that’s news. When one of the most anticipated fangames is absent from the largest fangame showcases, that’s news.
The PROBLEM in all of this is everybody else getting their panties in a bunch when that stuff shows up on TSSZ. It’s ironic that somebody is “tough enough” to hack a website but not tough enough to deal with somebody saying, “Look at what this guy over here said, isn’t that kind of weird?”
Nobody was this sensitive back when the original TSSZ launched, and the same community stories were being reported back then. The whole SSRG vs. Sonic-Cult meltdown saga, etc. Everybody needs to man up!
yes, we all know ScarredSun is a whiny ‘omg u guys stop talking about sonic on my sonic website’ hypocrite. This isn’t news.
…Tristian, man you suck. I wish TSSZ News would die.
Jealousy is a helluva drug.
What the fuck is wrong with you dude?
Get over it, christ.
Ryan, there’s a difference between community news and community whining. If an article like this showed up on another website, TSSZ would be covering this “news” as the bitchfit that it is.
Don’t try to cite other articles as a reason why this one is justified. That’s also quite the poor retort to the overall point behind Tru’s post. Sure, some of that may be “newsworthy” enough to cover, if you want to make that stretch, but that doesn’t at all address what Tru was trying to say. His point still stands.
Finally, until Tristan’s “police investigation” shows us a shred of goddamn evidence that Retro was behind the hacking, I’d love it if TSSZ would stfu about it. I’m not even a member there and I STILL find all this finger-pointing annoying.
I’ll still stay because this is a website I usually go to.
what the fuck is this?!
I can’t help but wonder if the reason this place isn’t brought in on exclusives is because of the way it conducts itself.
One thing that seems to be lost here is that comparisons are being made between two different sites. TSSZ positions itself as a news site, while Sonic Retro is an actual community consisting of a fair amount of Sonic fans, many of them the sort Sega seems to be trying to win back some favor with. One ought to strive to present itself one way, while the other gets more leeway. After all, it’s difficult to really control a community, while there’s much more of an expectation of conduct from a place that claims to be a news site.
I don’t keep up much on the community stuff, but I do lurk occasionally. I don’t believe I’ve ever seen Slingerland do anything he shouldn’t. He gives very frank opinions on Sonic and Sega, but he does it just in general, not hidden in the guise of “news” or underhandedly. I haven’t ever seen him claim to speak for anyone else, either.
Which brings me to my next point; there’s a difference between mocking a faceless company and breaking their security. Companies and those within them have become pretty adept at shrugging off the former. The latter rightly pisses them off. Sega’s practically been beseiged with leaks in recent years and that cannot make them happy. Having a member of staff of a news site actually go to the trouble of “hacking” one of their sites and leaking things is probably not something they’re going to care for and it’s not surprising they decided this place isn’t worth their time.
Again, Sonic Retro is a community; it doesn’t try to claim itself as a reputable news site. That might not seem like a huge difference, but it is. A difference as small as that can create different expectations of you; ones that can’t be deflected with schoolyard excuses like “well they did it first”.
On another major point, well, this place isn’t exactly one that one would rush to affiliate with. I’ll be honest, a lot of the time this place feels more like an internet tabloid than it does a news site. TSSZ tends to stir up a lot of drama, create bad feelings and “report” on things that really don’t matter. For instance, how exactly does the business of a different forum matter to the average reader? What do they care? It’s basically rubbernecking disguised as “reporting”; pointing out disasters in places other than here, hoping for some hits from the vultures who love a good trainwreck. It’s not conduct one would think befitting of a news site; if I want conspiracy theories or heresay on the motives of such-and-such, I’d go to a tabloid, not a news site.
How many would honestly want to affiliate with a website with conduct like that?
I can’t claim to know, but I know for sure I wouldn’t.
At some point, you have to start wondering if you’re doing it wrong. A good number of your readers, or at least people in the comments, speak out against this sort of thing pretty much every time it happens. Yet the hint is not taken. Sure, you get hits, but it’s usually because you’ve caused a storm of s***.
So I guess the real question is, is this site really a news site? Is it a tabloid? Is it a platform for petty grudges and anger? A place to peddle cheap schlock for quick hits? Because at times this place seems much less like the first one and more like the ones that followed.
Urhmmm..
Tristan, no offense, i’m a fan of your site, i’ve been visiting for years, and I do agree that it seems like favoritism that one site can leak an entire game and get rewarded for it, while another leaks character info and gets nothing, but this article.. i’d delete it if I were you. It’s way too long, comes off a tad bit whiny, and the ‘playing favorites’ subtitle… That’s gonna ruin any credibility this site has.
@dl316bh
Huh. I find your post difficult to argue with; congrats on being one of the few level headed people willing to comment.
It is true that this story raises several questions.
1 who in their right mind would right a story that long about a subject that doesnt seem to be of any interest to their readers. Except for those inerested in mocking the auther.
2 Does he really expect anyone to read something that long. I sure didnt.
3 Where is this guy and why isnt he defending himself.
4 Has Ryan lost his mind? Why is he waisting his time defending tristan when tristan doesnt even bother to respond to his critics.
@dl316bh
Rightly said.
@dl316bh
Couldn’t have said it better myself.
I’d like to point out something.
dl316bh’s comment was automatically marked as Spam…not by me, but by the system (the username prolly was read as a bot.) I checked the Spam system, read his comment, and moved it over so it could be read by everyone. That, and the 70 some odd things I read Sunday–and am perfectly fine with existing as attachments to this article, I might add–should prove I have no problem digesting fair criticism of this or any piece, so long as it tries to make a point. “Herp derp” is not a point. dl316bh’s remarks are. This is an article that deserves to foster intelligent and relevant discussion, even if it is critical of this site and me personally. I’ve deliberately excused myself from these comments to this point for that reason–I respect but feel no need to defend myself against the array of accusations made.
His main point of whether Sega treats “community” sites different from “news” sites like ours is valid, but I don’t think that’s ours to determine–it’s Sega’s, and we can only assume they’ve drawn that line as a guide for themselves. But again, go back to the one of the original points made in these comments–even if you’re being held to a lower standard, as a promotions person looking to ensure your product is being bought by as many people as possible, why do you wish to support a site where its members and staff been so asininely critical of the game they ultimately helped leak, to the point where they had to suspend discussion on the game twice? And in doing so, why would you blur the line between a personal friend and your professional duty on something so sensitive? In most other companies, given the circumstances and especially if it went through Sega’s own mail system, this could be something worthy of termination.
You guys can moan all you want about claiming jealousy and the like; understand this was a five month off and on endeavor, and the circumstances of Ratcliffe leaving so soon after he talked to me and started making all these promises for burying this (which, quite honestly, didn’t convince me) is what ultimately led to the decision to publish. I mention those conversations in the interest of full disclosure, nothing more. Most everything he told me was on the record, and anything he told me that wasn’t stayed out of this piece and the previous one concerning him last month. Many of you hold these stories to a higher standard–as you should–and that’s part of it. Covering that up doesn’t help us any.
I will say this: Since the article was first published, I’ve spotted a couple other news sources claiming off their main pages they were offered some perks pre-emptively to keep Sonic 4 leaks off their pages, and Sega hasn’t delivered. So, if nothing else, I hope you’ll try and see this the way I do: Sega may be OK with what’s been described in the story, but given how forceful they were across the board regarding the Sonic 4 leaks–including on Sonic Retro–it doesn’t make these actions any less boneheaded. If you’re going to point a finger at anyone, I think it needs to be at Sega in whole, because this is just one in a long list of documented examples on how the company really botched the Sonic 4 campaign.
-T
So, SEGA employees aren’t allowed to be kind to their friends? Rubbish.
How is claiming you removed the spam mark from a comment as spam show any story of integrity on your part when you have no problem deleting other dissenting comments. God forbid someone tells someone they can save money by NOT shopping with some company that you signed a referral agreement with. You didn’t even have the decency to give me one of your cute little inflammatory edits.
My username’s a bit funky, so I believe you when you say the spam system might have thought it was fishy. I created it ten years ago when I first got on the net and never really bothered to change it. I’m used to said username, basically.
@Ryan Bloom: Well, I don’t like being an outright prick if I don’t have to be. I’d much rather a discussion be as civil as possible if it can be. So I figured I’d pitch my viewpoint in here, as I felt that what I had to say hadn’t been covered by previous comments. But, well, I don’t want to sugarcoat it either.
@Tristan: I think it comes down partly to Sonic Retro being the top representation on the net of classic Sonic fans. There isn’t another truly prominent site I can think of surrounding that demographic. Sega very clearly wants that audience back. That’s clear by the existence of Sonic 4 in itself. So Sonic Retro can serve a lot of purposes; it can gauge reaction to the game, see where they might have gone wrong, what they might still need to do and what it will take to make even the more hardcore fans happy.
So there’s that. They also seem to be iffy about this place from the past as well. Then there’s the matter of iffy conduct; when I say this place strikes me as tabloid-esque at times, I say that just as my general opinion, untied to a Sonic community. That was one of my initial opinions when a friend pointed me here in the past. I personally come here for the news and it’s the chief reason I continue to come here, as it’s at times more dedicated to actual news related to Sonic than other sites. I know you and the rest don’t care what the people behind the other sites think of you, but they’re not the only factor involved; this sort of stuff can turn off your readers as well and impact how they see your site. If I said that I didn’t think ill of these sort of articles, I’d be lying to you.
Also, Sonic Retro seems a bit more compliant as far as removing things. If I recall right, there have been times in the past where this site has refused to take down leaked materials. Ultimately, that comes down to your decision, but it’s not the sort of actions that net you friends or partnerships. If anything, it’s the sort of thing a company is likely to remember in the future. Leaked stuff may be exclusive content for the heat of the moment, but not forever. The question then becomes “will this make things more difficult for me in the future”.
A question and a thought, if this goes through..
If you’re using people’s real names in an article on this, shouldn’t you be using your own too, Mr Bresnen?
Cinossu — Technically, I do. “Oliver” is my middle name, part of my birth name. I never liked it as a child, but the more I thought about it, the easier I think this is to remember. I have used my last name proper in previous incarnations of this site, and quite frankly, it’s bothered me less over time that others use it today. I’ve toyed with the idea of going back in this incarnation, and ultimately I have to when I sign up for press material, passes and the like. It’s not like I’m personally embarrassed to be connected to this community, as I know full well some other prominent figures in this fandom are (and, quite frankly, that’s their problem, not mine.) Plenty of people I know are aware of my association with this site.
A select few of you reading this site may even remember when I used to “sign” anything I wrote with just “TOB”–there’s a reason for that. Now, you know. =)
…And that will be the one exception I will make to your still ongoing ban for violating this site’s comment policy.
-T
You are totally pathetic. This entire article is just one long, ridiculous rant which boils down to jealously, greed, and an innate desire to make a “story” out of something.
Grow up Tristan. This sort of hate filled rubbish has no place in a civilized society.
I don’t want to be a troll but, you’re spouting bullshit. The way you wrote it, you making it look like Retro is part of some, “evil” conspiracy with Sega, Wrecks, and Stadium. Seriously please. REAL NEWS continue with that.